On 6 Apr 2016, at 17:14, Eric Blake wrote:
> I just re-reviewed this patch. While what you have is a strict
> improvement, it is still buggy for a server that sends a UTF-8 message
> explaining the error:
Indeed. That should be fixed too. I missed that one.
--
Alex Bligh
signature.asc
De
On 04/05/2016 12:55 PM, Alex Bligh wrote:
> nbd-client.c currently fails to handle unsupported options properly.
> If during option haggling the server finds an option that is
> unsupported, it returns an NBD_REP_ERR_UNSUP reply.
>
> According to nbd's proto.md, the format for such a reply
> shoul
On 05/04/2016 20:55, Alex Bligh wrote:
> nbd-client.c currently fails to handle unsupported options properly.
> If during option haggling the server finds an option that is
> unsupported, it returns an NBD_REP_ERR_UNSUP reply.
>
> According to nbd's proto.md, the format for such a reply
> should
nbd-client.c currently fails to handle unsupported options properly.
If during option haggling the server finds an option that is
unsupported, it returns an NBD_REP_ERR_UNSUP reply.
According to nbd's proto.md, the format for such a reply
should be:
S: 64 bits, 0x3e889045565a9 (magic number for
