On (Mon) 21 May 2012 [12:29:52], Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 04:44:38PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Thu) 17 May 2012 [08:49:44], Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:58:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > > On 05/16/2012 01:42 PM, Luiz Capituli
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 04:44:38PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Thu) 17 May 2012 [08:49:44], Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:58:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > On 05/16/2012 01:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > >On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:10:47 +0100
> > > >"Daniel
On (Thu) 17 May 2012 [08:49:44], Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:58:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 05/16/2012 01:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > >On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:10:47 +0100
> > >"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> > >
> > >>From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
> > >>
>
On Thu, 17 May 2012 16:20:42 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> Hmm, that's a good point, but my concern was that if we only emit
> >> the event when the target is reached, what happens if the guest
> >> gets very close to the target but never actually reaches it for
> >> some reason.
> >
> > Havi
On 05/17/2012 07:56 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 17 May 2012 08:49:44 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:58:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/16/2012 01:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:10:47 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
Fro
On Thu, 17 May 2012 08:49:44 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:58:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 05/16/2012 01:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > >On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:10:47 +0100
> > >"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> > >
> > >>From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
> >
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:58:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 01:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:10:47 +0100
> >"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> >
> >>From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
> >>
> >>After setting a balloon target value, applications have to
> >>continua
On Wed, 16 May 2012 13:58:34 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 01:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:10:47 +0100
> > "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> >
> >> From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
> >>
> >> After setting a balloon target value, applications have to
> >> continua
On 05/16/2012 01:42 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:10:47 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
After setting a balloon target value, applications have to
continually poll 'query-balloon' to determine whether the
guest has reacted to this request. The
On Wed, 16 May 2012 11:10:47 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
>
> After setting a balloon target value, applications have to
> continually poll 'query-balloon' to determine whether the
> guest has reacted to this request. The virtio-balloon backend
> knows exactly
From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
After setting a balloon target value, applications have to
continually poll 'query-balloon' to determine whether the
guest has reacted to this request. The virtio-balloon backend
knows exactly when the guest has reacted though, and thus it
is possible to emit a JSON eve
11 matches
Mail list logo
