On 07/09/2011 21:02, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>> On 05/09/2011 21:22, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Fabien Chouteau
>>> wrote:
On 03/09/2011 11:25, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Fabien Chout
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
> On 05/09/2011 21:22, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>>> On 03/09/2011 11:25, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Fabien Chouteau
wrote:
> Gdb expects all registers
On 05/09/2011 21:22, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>> On 03/09/2011 11:25, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Fabien Chouteau
>>> wrote:
Gdb expects all registers windows to be flushed in ram, which is not the
case
i
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
> On 03/09/2011 11:25, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>>> Gdb expects all registers windows to be flushed in ram, which is not the
>>> case
>>> in Qemu. Therefore the back-trace generation doesn't
On 03/09/2011 11:25, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>> Gdb expects all registers windows to be flushed in ram, which is not the case
>> in Qemu. Therefore the back-trace generation doesn't work. This patch adds a
>> function to handle reads/writes in sta
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
> Gdb expects all registers windows to be flushed in ram, which is not the case
> in Qemu. Therefore the back-trace generation doesn't work. This patch adds a
> function to handle reads/writes in stack frames as if windows were flushed.
>
> Si
Gdb expects all registers windows to be flushed in ram, which is not the case
in Qemu. Therefore the back-trace generation doesn't work. This patch adds a
function to handle reads/writes in stack frames as if windows were flushed.
Signed-off-by: Fabien Chouteau
---
gdbstub.c | 10 +
