On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Juergen Lock wrote:
> In article you write:
> >On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/17/2010 11:23 AM, Juergen Lock wrote:
> >> > As suggested by Andreas F?rber, here is a cumulative patch that syncs
> >> > OSS_GETVERSION handling with head by merging the
In article you write:
>On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> On 01/17/2010 11:23 AM, Juergen Lock wrote:
>> > As suggested by Andreas F?rber, here is a cumulative patch that syncs
>> > OSS_GETVERSION handling with head by merging the following commits:
>> >
>> > 1. oss: issue OSS_GETVE
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/17/2010 11:23 AM, Juergen Lock wrote:
> > As suggested by Andreas F?rber, here is a cumulative patch that syncs
> > OSS_GETVERSION handling with head by merging the following commits:
> >
> > 1. oss: issue OSS_GETVERSION ioctl only when needed
>
On 01/17/2010 11:23 AM, Juergen Lock wrote:
As suggested by Andreas Färber, here is a cumulative patch that syncs
OSS_GETVERSION handling with head by merging the following commits:
1. oss: issue OSS_GETVERSION ioctl only when needed
6d246526ce3c145b2831285def6983f5de6190d3
2. oss: fix frag
As suggested by Andreas Färber, here is a cumulative patch that syncs
OSS_GETVERSION handling with head by merging the following commits:
1. oss: issue OSS_GETVERSION ioctl only when needed
6d246526ce3c145b2831285def6983f5de6190d3
2. oss: fix fragment setting
3d709fe73a77c40e263b3af6e650fd4