On 22 November 2011 03:25, Peter Chubb wrote:
> Properly implement dual-timer read/write for the sp804 dual timer module.
> Based on ARM specs at
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0271d/index.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Jang
> Signed-off-by: David Mirabito
> Signe
Properly implement dual-timer read/write for the sp804 dual timer module.
Based on ARM specs at
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0271d/index.html
Signed-off-by: Hans Jang
Signed-off-by: David Mirabito
Signed-off-by: Peter Chubb
---
hw/arm_timer.c | 41 +
Am 21.11.2011 23:05, schrieb Peter Chubb:
> Hi Peter,
>Here's a fixed patch for the sp804 timer.
>
> Properly implement the dual-timer read/write for the sp804 dual timer module.
> Based on ARM specs at
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0271d/index.html
>
> Sign
Hi Peter,
Here's a fixed patch for the sp804 timer.
Properly implement the dual-timer read/write for the sp804 dual timer module.
Based on ARM specs at
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0271d/index.html
Signed-off-by: Peter Chubb
Signed-off-by: David Mirabito
Sig
On 30 September 2011 10:23, Peter Chubb wrote:
>> "Peter" == Peter Maydell writes:
> Peter> hw_error() is a fatal error -- don't use it for conditions that
> Peter> can be triggered by a malicious guest. (And since it's noreturn
> Peter> there's not much point putting any code after it...)
>
> "Peter" == Peter Maydell writes:
Peter> On 30 September 2011 01:20, Peter Chubb
Peter> wrote:
>> Thanks Peter!
>>
>> Here's a reworked patch.
Peter> NB: when you resend patches it's better to send them as
Peter> completely fresh emails (via git-send-email or equivalent)
Peter> because ot
On 30 September 2011 01:20, Peter Chubb wrote:
> Thanks Peter!
>
> Here's a reworked patch.
NB: when you resend patches it's better to send them as completely
fresh emails (via git-send-email or equivalent) because otherwise they're
more of a pain to apply (you end up with random email chatter in
Thanks Peter!
Here's a reworked patch.
From 7af8e24d6cbd9170a206b6aaac164e3934312b7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Mirabito
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:43:14 +1000
Subject: [PATCH 53/57] Fix sp804 read/write for second timer.
Properly implement the dual-timer read/write for the sp804 dual
On 29 September 2011 03:34, Peter Chubb wrote:
> -/* ??? Don't know the PrimeCell ID for this device. */
> if (offset < 0x20) {
> return arm_timer_read(s->timer[0], offset);
> -} else {
> +}
> +if (offset < 0x40) {
> return arm_timer_read(s->timer[1], offset -
This patch was written by David Mirabito.
Properly implement the dual-timer read/write for the sp804 dual timer module.
Based on ARM specs at
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0271d/index.html
Signed-off-by: Peter Chubb
Signed-off-by: David Mirabito
Signed-off-by:
10 matches
Mail list logo