Le lundi 04 février 2013 à 15:16 +, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 31 January 2013 19:50, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > The parameter "union semun" of semctl() is not a value
> > but a pointer to the value.
>
> Hi. For your next patch could you make sure you send it as
> a fresh email rather than a
On 31 January 2013 19:50, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> The parameter "union semun" of semctl() is not a value
> but a pointer to the value.
Hi. For your next patch could you make sure you send it as
a fresh email rather than a followup to the previous version?
Anthony's patch-handling tools don't real
The parameter "union semun" of semctl() is not a value
but a pointer to the value.
Moreover, all fields of target_su must be swapped (if needed).
The third argument of shmctl is a pointer.
WITHOUT this patch:
$ ipcs
kernel not configured for shared memory
qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segm
