在 2013-03-21四的 10:41 +，Peter Maydell写道：
> On 21 March 2013 00:36, li guang wrote:
> > 在 2013-03-20三的 10:50 +，Peter Maydell写道：
> >> The devices should just implement appropriate signals/connections
> >> if they have a means of talking to a power controller, and the
> >> board model should w
On 21 March 2013 00:36, li guang wrote:
> 在 2013-03-20三的 10:50 +，Peter Maydell写道：
>> The devices should just implement appropriate signals/connections
>> if they have a means of talking to a power controller, and the
>> board model should wire them up. That's all.
>
> Hmm, can you give some de
在 2013-03-20三的 10:50 +，Peter Maydell写道：
> On 20 March 2013 00:56, li guang wrote:
> > 在 2013-03-19二的 10:15 +，Peter Maydell写道：
> >> The point is that how exactly power controllers connect
> >> to devices, and which devices respond to reset/suspend/etc
> >> is a property of the individual ma
On 20 March 2013 00:56, li guang wrote:
> 在 2013-03-19二的 10:15 +，Peter Maydell写道：
>> The point is that how exactly power controllers connect
>> to devices, and which devices respond to reset/suspend/etc
>> is a property of the individual machine being modelled.
>> An x86 PC will be different f
在 2013-03-19二的 10:15 +，Peter Maydell写道：
> On 19 March 2013 09:31, li guang wrote:
> > 在 2013-03-19二的 09:05 +，Peter Maydell写道：
> >> I suspect this should involve more modelling of actual
> >> control signals between the power controller and
> >> the devices, not methods on the base class.
>
On 19 March 2013 09:31, li guang wrote:
> 在 2013-03-19二的 09:05 +，Peter Maydell写道：
>> I suspect this should involve more modelling of actual
>> control signals between the power controller and
>> the devices, not methods on the base class.
>>
>
> do we have to realize something like signals whi
在 2013-03-19二的 09:05 +，Peter Maydell写道：
> On 19 March 2013 00:55, li guang wrote:
> > 在 2013-03-18一的 11:07 +，Peter Maydell写道：
> >> I'm really dubious that this can or should be implemented by
> >> adding methods at the device base class level. I don't think
> >> real hardware works this wa
On 19 March 2013 00:55, li guang wrote:
> 在 2013-03-18一的 11:07 +，Peter Maydell写道：
>> I'm really dubious that this can or should be implemented by
>> adding methods at the device base class level. I don't think
>> real hardware works this way.
>
> and what it should be?
>
>> You could probably
在 2013-03-18一的 11:07 +，Peter Maydell写道：
> On 13 March 2013 08:01, liguang wrote:
> > By now, all devices of QEMU do not have much more
> > power management consideration, for example, if
> > system do suspend, it will call all registered notifiers,
> > this was loosely required, and the code t
On 13 March 2013 08:01, liguang wrote:
> By now, all devices of QEMU do not have much more
> power management consideration, for example, if
> system do suspend, it will call all registered notifiers,
> this was loosely required, and the code to do power management
> state transition seems just do
在 2013-03-18一的 09:34 +0100，Andreas Färber写道：
> Am 13.03.2013 09:01, schrieb liguang:
> > Li Guang (14)
> > gitignore: ignore more files
> > qdev: add power management method
> > qdev: remove redundant abort()
> > qdev: add power on/off/suspend/wakeup handler
>
> > power: a
Am 13.03.2013 09:01, schrieb liguang:
> Li Guang (14)
>gitignore: ignore more files
>qdev: add power management method
>qdev: remove redundant abort()
>qdev: add power on/off/suspend/wakeup handler
>power: add power chip emulation
This patch seems to be mis
ping ...
在 2013-03-15五的 08:59 +0800，li guang写道：
> Hi, Anthony
>
> Sorry to bother you,
> can you please help to see it this work is
> worth to go on, or ...
>
> or someone else can help to see this patch-set.
>
> Thanks All.
>
>
> 在 2013-03-13三的 16:01 +0800，liguang写道：
> > By now, all devices
Hi, Anthony
Sorry to bother you,
can you please help to see it this work is
worth to go on, or ...
or someone else can help to see this patch-set.
Thanks All.
在 2013-03-13三的 16:01 +0800，liguang写道：
> By now, all devices of QEMU do not have much more
> power management consideration, for example
By now, all devices of QEMU do not have much more
power management consideration, for example, if
system do suspend, it will call all registered notifiers,
this was loosely required, and the code to do power management
state transition seems just do 'ugly emulation', rather than be
conscious with w
15 matches
Mail list logo
