Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Fix softfloat NaN handling

2007-05-09 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Blue Swirl wrote: > On 5/9/07, Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hello All, > > > >The relevant IEEE standards don't define if a set or a clear bit is > >used to distinguish between QNaN and SNaN. MIPS, and apparently > >PA RISC, made a different choice than the rest of the industry. > >

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Fix softfloat NaN handling

2007-05-09 Thread Blue Swirl
On 5/9/07, Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello All, The relevant IEEE standards don't define if a set or a clear bit is used to distinguish between QNaN and SNaN. MIPS, and apparently PA RISC, made a different choice than the rest of the industry. On Sparc, the rule is as follows:

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC] Fix softfloat NaN handling

2007-05-09 Thread Thiemo Seufer
Hello All, The relevant IEEE standards don't define if a set or a clear bit is used to distinguish between QNaN and SNaN. MIPS, and apparently PA RISC, made a different choice than the rest of the industry. The appended patch accounts for this, it fixes a number of failures on MIPS, none of those