Aurelien Jarno wrote:
[snip]
> >> - 64-bit is implemented, the PX bit should be writable.
> >
> > The current version is correct, R4000 and 5K don't implement PX, the
> > 20Kc and later CPUs do.
>
> I don't know about R4000, but the 5K manual (from www.mips.com) clearly
> says that this bit is im
Thiemo Seufer a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The patch below fixes the Status_rw_bitmask values for 64-bit CPUs:
>> - Reverse endianess is currently not implemented, the RE bit should
>> not be writable.
>
> OTOH, those CPUs support RE, that's why I left the bit writable.
>
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The patch below fixes the Status_rw_bitmask values for 64-bit CPUs:
> - Reverse endianess is currently not implemented, the RE bit should
> not be writable.
OTOH, those CPUs support RE, that's why I left the bit writable.
I think you'll have to boot RiscOS t
Hi all,
The patch below fixes the Status_rw_bitmask values for 64-bit CPUs:
- Reverse endianess is currently not implemented, the RE bit should
not be writable.
- 64-bit is implemented, the PX bit should be writable.
Bye,
Aurelien
Index: target-mips/translate_init.c
==
