Am 05.01.2013 04:05, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> Andreas Färber writes:
>> Am 02.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> 2) Patches that no longer apply via git am --3way will receive a
>>> notification.
>>
>> Isn't Nacked-by too strong of a notification for a mere technical need
>> for
Andreas Färber writes:
> Hi,
>
> Am 02.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> 2) Patches that no longer apply via git am --3way will receive a
>> notification.
>
> Isn't Nacked-by too strong of a notification for a mere technical need
> for a rebase (compared to a rejection of its conc
Hi,
Am 02.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> 2) Patches that no longer apply via git am --3way will receive a
> notification.
Isn't Nacked-by too strong of a notification for a mere technical need
for a rebase (compared to a rejection of its concept/approach)?
Also, since quite a f
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 12:07:57PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Over the holiday, I spent some time overhauling my patch tracking
> scripts. One new feature is automated responses so you will start
> seeing some additional mail on the list. Notably:
>
> 1) My 'Thanks, applied.' mai
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Over the holiday, I spent some time overhauling my patch tracking
> scripts. One new feature is automated responses so you will start
> seeing some additional mail on the list. Notably:
>
> 1) My 'Thanks, applied.' mails are now
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 12:07:57PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Over the holiday, I spent some time overhauling my patch tracking
> scripts. One new feature is automated responses so you will start
> seeing some additional mail on the list. Notably:
>
> 1) My 'Thanks, applied.' mails are no
Hi,
Over the holiday, I spent some time overhauling my patch tracking
scripts. One new feature is automated responses so you will start
seeing some additional mail on the list. Notably:
1) My 'Thanks, applied.' mails are now automated.
2) Patches that no longer apply via git am --3way will
