[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1748434] Re: Possibly wrong GICv3 behavior when secure enabled

2018-04-25 Thread Thomas Huth
** Changed in: qemu Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748434 Title: Possibly wrong GICv3 behavior when secure enabled Status in QEMU: Fi

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1748434] Re: Possibly wrong GICv3 behavior when secure enabled

2018-04-10 Thread Peter Maydell
Now fixed in master in commit a2e2d7fc46fd8be, so will be in 2.12.0. ** Changed in: qemu Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748434 Title: P

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1748434] Re: Possibly wrong GICv3 behavior when secure enabled

2018-03-15 Thread Peter Maydell
Patch which should fix this: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2018-03/msg04537.html ** Changed in: qemu Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1748434] Re: Possibly wrong GICv3 behavior when secure enabled

2018-03-15 Thread Peter Maydell
Whoops, yes, we have the wrong condition for ICC_PMR non-secure reads and writes. We also have the same bug in ICC_RPR reads. I'll put together a patch and send it to the mailing list. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. h

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1748434] Re: Possibly wrong GICv3 behavior when secure enabled

2018-03-15 Thread Peter Maydell
** Tags added: arm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1748434 Title: Possibly wrong GICv3 behavior when secure enabled Status in QEMU: New Bug description: I an tried arm-aarch64 i

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1748434] Re: Possibly wrong GICv3 behavior when secure enabled

2018-02-09 Thread Robert Pasz
see possible solution, in #if 0 is original code in #else see possible fix static uint64_t icc_pmr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri) #if 0 // KIURCHER: bug - shall be opposite; see ARM specification if (value & 0x80) { /* Secure priorities not visible to NS */