On Sat, 2016-04-16 at 00:27 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-15-04 at 02:06:13 UTC, Unknown sender due to SPF wrote:
> > The real LE feature entry in the ibm_pa_feature struct has the
> > wrong number of elements. Instead of checking for byte 5, bit 0,
> > we check for byte 0, bit 0, a
On Fri, 2016-15-04 at 02:06:13 UTC, Unknown sender due to SPF wrote:
> The real LE feature entry in the ibm_pa_feature struct has the
> wrong number of elements. Instead of checking for byte 5, bit 0,
> we check for byte 0, bit 0, and we also incorrectly update cpu user
> feature bit 5.
>
> diff -
On Fri, 2016-15-04 at 02:06:13 UTC, Unknown sender due to SPF wrote:
> The real LE feature entry in the ibm_pa_feature struct has the
> wrong number of elements. Instead of checking for byte 5, bit 0,
> we check for byte 0, bit 0, and we also incorrectly update cpu user
> feature bit 5.
>
> Fixes: