Re: Status/future of QEMU bsd-user impl ? (Wea Re: [PULL 00/12] Compile QEMU with -Wimplicit-fallthrough)

2020-12-17 Thread Warner Losh
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:10 AM Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:21 AM Peter Maydell > wrote: > >> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 16:03, Warner Losh wrote: >> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 7:02 AM Daniel P. Berrangé >> wrote: >> >> I don't recall what happened after that initial discuss

Re: Status/future of QEMU bsd-user impl ? (Wea Re: [PULL 00/12] Compile QEMU with -Wimplicit-fallthrough)

2020-12-17 Thread Warner Losh
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:21 AM Peter Maydell wrote: > On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 16:03, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 7:02 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > >> I don't recall what happened after that initial discussion about > >> merging the new impl. Did Sean simply not have the t

Re: Status/future of QEMU bsd-user impl ? (Wea Re: [PULL 00/12] Compile QEMU with -Wimplicit-fallthrough)

2020-12-17 Thread Peter Maydell
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 16:03, Warner Losh wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 7:02 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: >> I don't recall what happened after that initial discussion about >> merging the new impl. Did Sean simply not have the time to invest >> in the merge ? I'll CC him here to see what o

Re: Status/future of QEMU bsd-user impl ? (Wea Re: [PULL 00/12] Compile QEMU with -Wimplicit-fallthrough)

2020-12-17 Thread Warner Losh
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 7:02 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:03:47PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > > On 17/12/2020 13.51, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 17:29, Thomas Huth wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi! > > >> > > >> The following changes since commit > af3f

Status/future of QEMU bsd-user impl ? (Wea Re: [PULL 00/12] Compile QEMU with -Wimplicit-fallthrough)

2020-12-17 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 02:03:47PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 17/12/2020 13.51, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 17:29, Thomas Huth wrote: > >> > >> Hi! > >> > >> The following changes since commit > >> af3f37319cb1e1ca0c42842ecdbd1bcfc64a4b6f: > >> > >> Merge remote-trackin

Re: [PULL 00/12] Compile QEMU with -Wimplicit-fallthrough

2020-12-17 Thread Thomas Huth
On 17/12/2020 13.51, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 17:29, Thomas Huth wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> The following changes since commit af3f37319cb1e1ca0c42842ecdbd1bcfc64a4b6f: >> >> Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/bonzini-gitlab/tags/for-upstream' >> into staging (2020-12-15 21

Re: [PULL 00/12] Compile QEMU with -Wimplicit-fallthrough

2020-12-17 Thread Peter Maydell
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 17:29, Thomas Huth wrote: > > Hi! > > The following changes since commit af3f37319cb1e1ca0c42842ecdbd1bcfc64a4b6f: > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/bonzini-gitlab/tags/for-upstream' > into staging (2020-12-15 21:24:31 +) > > are available in the Git reposito

Re: [PULL 00/12] Compile QEMU with -Wimplicit-fallthrough

2020-12-16 Thread Thomas Huth
Message-id: 20201216172949.57380-1-th...@redhat.com > Subject: [PULL 00/12] Compile QEMU with -Wimplicit-fallthrough > > === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === > #!/bin/bash > git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0 > git config --local diff.renamelimit 0 > git config --local diff.r

Re: [PULL 00/12] Compile QEMU with -Wimplicit-fallthrough

2020-12-16 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20201216172949.57380-1-th...@redhat.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Type: series Message-id: 20201216172949.57380-1-th...@redhat.com Subject: [PULL 00/12] Compile QEMU with -Wimplicit

[PULL 00/12] Compile QEMU with -Wimplicit-fallthrough

2020-12-16 Thread Thomas Huth
Hi! The following changes since commit af3f37319cb1e1ca0c42842ecdbd1bcfc64a4b6f: Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/bonzini-gitlab/tags/for-upstream' into staging (2020-12-15 21:24:31 +) are available in the Git repository at: https://gitlab.com/huth/qemu.git tags/pull-request-2020