On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:29 AM Frank Chang wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 11:13 AM Alistair Francis
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 1:06 PM wrote:
>> >
>> > From: Tommy Wu
>> >
>> > Because the RNMI interrupt trap handler address is implementation
>> defined.
>> > We add the 'rnmi-in
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 11:13 AM Alistair Francis
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 1:06 PM wrote:
> >
> > From: Tommy Wu
> >
> > Because the RNMI interrupt trap handler address is implementation
> defined.
> > We add the 'rnmi-interrupt-vector' and 'rnmi-exception-vector' as the
> property
> >
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 1:06 PM wrote:
>
> From: Tommy Wu
>
> Because the RNMI interrupt trap handler address is implementation defined.
> We add the 'rnmi-interrupt-vector' and 'rnmi-exception-vector' as the property
> of the harts. It’s very easy for users to set the address based on their
> ex
From: Tommy Wu
Because the RNMI interrupt trap handler address is implementation defined.
We add the 'rnmi-interrupt-vector' and 'rnmi-exception-vector' as the property
of the harts. It’s very easy for users to set the address based on their
expectation. This patch also adds the functionality to
