On 9/3/22 14:09, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 13:02, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:50:34PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Not sure which job to choose yet. Per the first google hits we
still want to cover Catalina first:
https://www.statista.com/stat
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 13:02, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:50:34PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Not sure which job to choose yet. Per the first google hits we
> > still want to cover Catalina first:
> > https://www.statista.com/statistics/944559/worldwide-mac
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:50:34PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 9/3/22 13:33, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 12:58:42PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> > > Basically fine for me, but can we really run additional cirrus-ci jobs by
> > > default? IIRC the parallel e
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 01:52:15PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 09/03/2022 13.50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> > Would it be beneficial to have a 1 per OS job during PR, and
> > other jobs run nightly (once a day, not per PR)?
>
> Is there a way to trigger nightly runs in gitlab?
Yes, in
On 09/03/2022 13.50, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Would it be beneficial to have a 1 per OS job during PR, and
other jobs run nightly (once a day, not per PR)?
Is there a way to trigger nightly runs in gitlab?
Thomas
On 9/3/22 13:33, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 12:58:42PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
Basically fine for me, but can we really run additional cirrus-ci jobs by
default? IIRC the parallel execution of those were quite limited for the
free tier, so did you look close that we do
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 12:58:42PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 09/03/2022 11.24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Hi Alex, Thomas, Daniel,
> >
> > Could you ack this patch?
>
> Basically fine for me, but can we really run additional cirrus-ci jobs by
> default? IIRC the parallel execution of t
On 09/03/2022 11.24, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Alex, Thomas, Daniel,
Could you ack this patch?
Basically fine for me, but can we really run additional cirrus-ci jobs by
default? IIRC the parallel execution of those were quite limited for the
free tier, so did you look close that we do
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 12:17:53AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
>
> Add support for macOS 12 build on Cirrus-CI, similarly to commit
> 0e103a65ba1 ("gitlab: support for ... macOS 11 via cirrus-run"),
> but with the following differences:
> - Enable modules
Hi Alex, Thomas, Daniel,
Could you ack this patch?
On 7/3/22 00:17, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Add support for macOS 12 build on Cirrus-CI, similarly to commit
0e103a65ba1 ("gitlab: support for ... macOS 11 via cirrus-run"),
but with the following differences:
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Add support for macOS 12 build on Cirrus-CI, similarly to commit
0e103a65ba1 ("gitlab: support for ... macOS 11 via cirrus-run"),
but with the following differences:
- Enable modules (configure --enable-modules)
- Do not run softfloat3 tests (make check-softfloat)
11 matches
Mail list logo
