Eric Blake writes:
> There is no need to rely on the verbosity of the gcc/clang compiler
> extension of g_new(typeof(X), 1) when we can instead use the standard
> g_malloc(sizeof(X)). In general, we like g_new over g_malloc for
> returning type X rather than void* to let the compiler catch more
27.10.2020 08:05, Eric Blake wrote:
There is no need to rely on the verbosity of the gcc/clang compiler
extension of g_new(typeof(X), 1) when we can instead use the standard
g_malloc(sizeof(X)). In general, we like g_new over g_malloc for
returning type X rather than void* to let the compiler ca
There is no need to rely on the verbosity of the gcc/clang compiler
extension of g_new(typeof(X), 1) when we can instead use the standard
g_malloc(sizeof(X)). In general, we like g_new over g_malloc for
returning type X rather than void* to let the compiler catch more
potential typing mistakes, bu
