Hi,
On 14/3/25 19:39, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
On 3/14/25 11:34, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:33:08AM -0700, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Hi,
one patch is missing review:
[PATCH v5 12/17] hw/xen: add stubs for various functions.
My "Acked-by" wasn't enough? Feel free try chang
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes:
> Hi,
>
> On 14/3/25 19:39, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
>> On 3/14/25 11:34, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:33:08AM -0700, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Hi,
one patch is missing review:
[PATCH v5 12/17] hw/xen: add stubs for various f
The main goal of this series is to be able to call any memory ld/st function
from code that is *not* target dependent. As a positive side effect, we can
turn related system compilation units into common code.
The first 5 patches remove dependency of memory API to cpu headers and remove
dependency
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:33:08AM -0700, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one patch is missing review:
> [PATCH v5 12/17] hw/xen: add stubs for various functions.
My "Acked-by" wasn't enough? Feel free try change it to "Reviewed-by"
instead.
Cheers,
--
Anthony Perard | Vates XCP-ng Develope
On 3/14/25 11:34, Anthony PERARD wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 10:33:08AM -0700, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
Hi,
one patch is missing review:
[PATCH v5 12/17] hw/xen: add stubs for various functions.
My "Acked-by" wasn't enough? Feel free try change it to "Reviewed-by"
instead.
Those are diff
Hi,
one patch is missing review:
[PATCH v5 12/17] hw/xen: add stubs for various functions.
Regards,
Pierrick
On 3/14/25 10:31, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
The main goal of this series is to be able to call any memory ld/st function
from code that is *not* target dependent. As a positive side effec
