Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] 64bit block-layer: part II

2021-06-04 Thread Eric Blake
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 10:49:50AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Hi all! > > v5: rebase on master, fix block comments style and over-80 line. > 01: s/{}/()/ in subject, so that email not to be mangled. Don't worry too much about that; if it happens again on v6, I can manually fix t

Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] 64bit block-layer: part II

2021-05-05 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
...@virtuozzo.com Subject: [PATCH v5 00/11] 64bit block-layer: part II === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash git rev-parse base > /dev/null || exit 0 git config --local diff.renamelimit 0 git config --local diff.renames True git config --local diff.algorithm histogram ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailb

Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] 64bit block-layer: part II

2021-05-05 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20210505075001.45041-1-vsement...@virtuozzo.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Type: series Message-id: 20210505075001.45041-1-vsement...@virtuozzo.com Subject: [PATCH v5 00/11] 64bit

[PATCH v5 00/11] 64bit block-layer: part II

2021-05-05 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Hi all! v5: rebase on master, fix block comments style and over-80 line. 01: s/{}/()/ in subject, so that email not to be mangled. part II aims to update block drivers to int64_t. I remind that main aim of this update of the whole block-layer to 64bit is to implement 64bit write-zeroes NBD reque