On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:25:46PM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 03:18:23PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 06/03/2023 15.06, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:48:16PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > > On 06/03/2023 10.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wr
On 6/3/23 15:06, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:48:16PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 06/03/2023 10.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:46:55AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
[...] If a 32-bit CPU guest
+environment should be enforced, you can switch off th
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 03:18:23PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 06/03/2023 15.06, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:48:16PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > On 06/03/2023 10.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:46:55AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
On 06/03/2023 15.06, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:48:16PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 06/03/2023 10.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:46:55AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
[...] If a 32-bit CPU guest
+environment should be enforced, you can switch of
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:48:16PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 06/03/2023 10.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:46:55AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > [...] If a 32-bit CPU guest
> > > +environment should be enforced, you can switch off the "long mode" CPU
> > > +flag,
On 06/03/2023 10.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:46:55AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
[...] If a 32-bit CPU guest
+environment should be enforced, you can switch off the "long mode" CPU
+flag, e.g. with ``-cpu max,lm=off``.
I had the idea to check this today and this is n
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 10:54:15AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 06/03/2023 10.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:46:55AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > Aside from not supporting KVM on 32-bit hosts, the qemu-system-x86_64
> > > binary is a proper superset of the qemu-sy
On 06/03/2023 10.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:46:55AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
Aside from not supporting KVM on 32-bit hosts, the qemu-system-x86_64
binary is a proper superset of the qemu-system-i386 binary. With the
32-bit host support being deprecated, it is now a
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:46:55AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Aside from not supporting KVM on 32-bit hosts, the qemu-system-x86_64
> binary is a proper superset of the qemu-system-i386 binary. With the
> 32-bit host support being deprecated, it is now also possible to
> deprecate the qemu-system-
Aside from not supporting KVM on 32-bit hosts, the qemu-system-x86_64
binary is a proper superset of the qemu-system-i386 binary. With the
32-bit host support being deprecated, it is now also possible to
deprecate the qemu-system-i386 binary.
With regards to 32-bit KVM support in the x86 Linux ker
10 matches
Mail list logo
