Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64

2023-04-20 Thread Harsh Prateek Bora
On 4/21/23 12:08, Kautuk Consul wrote: Adding Harsh Prateek Bora . On 2023-04-20 23:23:22, Kautuk Consul wrote: Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https:/

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64

2023-04-20 Thread Kautuk Consul
Adding Harsh Prateek Bora . On 2023-04-20 23:23:22, Kautuk Consul wrote: > Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the > boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc > decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64

2023-04-20 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 21/4/23 06:23, Kautuk Consul wrote: Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that t

[PATCH v4 2/2] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py: improve code coverage for ppc64

2023-04-20 Thread Kautuk Consul
Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the boot_linux.py test-case due to which the code coverage for ppc decreased by around 2%. As per the discussion on https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/87sfdpqcy4@linaro.org/ it was mentioned that the baseline test for ppc64 could be modif