Re: [PATCH v4 10/16] migration/multifd: Isolate ram pages packet data

2024-08-26 Thread Fabiano Rosas
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé writes: > On 23/8/24 19:39, Fabiano Rosas wrote: >> While we cannot yet disentangle the multifd packet from page data, we >> can make the code a bit cleaner by setting the page-related fields in >> a separate function. >> >> Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas >> --- >> migrat

Re: [PATCH v4 10/16] migration/multifd: Isolate ram pages packet data

2024-08-26 Thread Peter Xu
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 02:39:05PM -0300, Fabiano Rosas wrote: > While we cannot yet disentangle the multifd packet from page data, we > can make the code a bit cleaner by setting the page-related fields in > a separate function. > > Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas Reviewed-by: Peter Xu -- Peter

Re: [PATCH v4 10/16] migration/multifd: Isolate ram pages packet data

2024-08-25 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 23/8/24 19:39, Fabiano Rosas wrote: While we cannot yet disentangle the multifd packet from page data, we can make the code a bit cleaner by setting the page-related fields in a separate function. Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas --- migration/multifd.c| 99 +---

[PATCH v4 10/16] migration/multifd: Isolate ram pages packet data

2024-08-23 Thread Fabiano Rosas
While we cannot yet disentangle the multifd packet from page data, we can make the code a bit cleaner by setting the page-related fields in a separate function. Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas --- migration/multifd.c| 99 +- migration/trace-events | 5 ++