Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 09:29:34AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 03:49:39PM -0700, Daniel Xu wrote:
> > Previously capture-output was an optional boolean flag that either
> > captured all output or captured none. While this is OK in most cases, it
> > lacks
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 03:49:39PM -0700, Daniel Xu wrote:
> Previously capture-output was an optional boolean flag that either
> captured all output or captured none. While this is OK in most cases, it
> lacks flexibility for more advanced capture cases, such as wanting to
> only capture stdout.
>
Previously capture-output was an optional boolean flag that either
captured all output or captured none. While this is OK in most cases, it
lacks flexibility for more advanced capture cases, such as wanting to
only capture stdout.
This commits refactors guest-exec qapi to take an enum for capture
