On Wed, 16 Apr 2025, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 4/16/25 16:38, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
The only concern I have is that we could create silent "performance"
related bugs, where a specific feature is deactivated because of a bad
combination, but it's inherent to this approach and not a blocker.
Hi Richard,
On 4/15/25 12:22, Richard Henderson wrote:
v2: 20250107080112.1175095-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org
v3: 20250216231012.2808572-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org
Since it has been 2 months, I don't recall specific changes from v3 to v4.
It's mostly application of r-b tags. There is on
On 4/16/25 17:18, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 4/16/25 16:38, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
The only concern I have is that we could create silent "performance" related
bugs, where a
specific feature is deactivated because of a bad combination, but it's inherent
to this
approach and not a blocker.
On 4/16/25 16:38, Pierrick Bouvier wrote:
The only concern I have is that we could create silent "performance" related bugs, where a
specific feature is deactivated because of a bad combination, but it's inherent to this
approach and not a blocker.
I think I know what you mean, and the way I s
On Wed Apr 16, 2025 at 5:22 AM AEST, Richard Henderson wrote:
> v2: 20250107080112.1175095-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org
> v3: 20250216231012.2808572-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org
>
> Since it has been 2 months, I don't recall specific changes from v3 to v4.
> It's mostly application of r-b tags.
v2: 20250107080112.1175095-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org
v3: 20250216231012.2808572-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org
Since it has been 2 months, I don't recall specific changes from v3 to v4.
It's mostly application of r-b tags. There is one more patch, which I
believe was Phil asking for one patc