On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 10:53:01AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > As commented offline, maybe one would want the option to enable the
> > > alternative mode, where such updates (in the SHM region) are not sent to
> > > vhost-user devices. In such a configuration, the MEM_READ / MEM_WRITE
> >
As commented offline, maybe one would want the option to enable the
alternative mode, where such updates (in the SHM region) are not sent to
vhost-user devices. In such a configuration, the MEM_READ / MEM_WRITE
would be unavoidable.
At first, I remember we discussed two options, having update me
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 2:57 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> On 24.02.25 14:41, Albert Esteve wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:49 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>
> >> On 24.02.25 10:35, Albert Esteve wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:16 AM David Hildenbrand
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>
On 24.02.25 14:41, Albert Esteve wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:49 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 24.02.25 10:35, Albert Esteve wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:16 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 24.02.25 09:54, Albert Esteve wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 9:01 PM David Hildenbrand wr
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:49 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> On 24.02.25 10:35, Albert Esteve wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:16 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>
> >> On 24.02.25 09:54, Albert Esteve wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 9:01 PM David Hildenbrand
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>
On 24.02.25 10:35, Albert Esteve wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:16 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 24.02.25 09:54, Albert Esteve wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 9:01 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 17.02.25 17:40, Albert Esteve wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
looks like our debugging session was s
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:16 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> On 24.02.25 09:54, Albert Esteve wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 9:01 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>
> >> On 17.02.25 17:40, Albert Esteve wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> looks like our debugging session was suc
On 24.02.25 09:54, Albert Esteve wrote:
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 9:01 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 17.02.25 17:40, Albert Esteve wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
looks like our debugging session was successfu :)
One question below.
v3->v4
- Change mmap strategy to use RAM blocks
and subregions.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 9:01 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> On 17.02.25 17:40, Albert Esteve wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> looks like our debugging session was successfu :)
>
> One question below.
>
> > v3->v4
> > - Change mmap strategy to use RAM blocks
> >and subregions.
> > - Add new
On 17.02.25 17:40, Albert Esteve wrote:
Hi all,
Hi,
looks like our debugging session was successfu :)
One question below.
v3->v4
- Change mmap strategy to use RAM blocks
and subregions.
- Add new bitfield to qmp feature map
- Followed most review comments from
last iteration.
- Merge
Hi all,
v3->v4
- Change mmap strategy to use RAM blocks
and subregions.
- Add new bitfield to qmp feature map
- Followed most review comments from
last iteration.
- Merged documentation patch again with
this one. Makes more sense to
review them together after all.
- Add documentation for M
11 matches
Mail list logo