Re: [PATCH v3 13/20] cputlb: Move NOTDIRTY handling from I/O path to TLB path

2019-09-23 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 9/22/19 5:54 AM, Richard Henderson wrote: > Pages that we want to track for NOTDIRTY are RAM. We do not > really need to go through the I/O path to handle them. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson > --- > include/exec/cpu-common.h | 2 -- > accel/tcg/cputlb.c| 26 +-

Re: [PATCH v3 13/20] cputlb: Move NOTDIRTY handling from I/O path to TLB path

2019-09-23 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 22.09.19 05:54, Richard Henderson wrote: > Pages that we want to track for NOTDIRTY are RAM. We do not > really need to go through the I/O path to handle them. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson > --- > include/exec/cpu-common.h | 2 -- > accel/tcg/cputlb.c| 26 +--

[PATCH v3 13/20] cputlb: Move NOTDIRTY handling from I/O path to TLB path

2019-09-21 Thread Richard Henderson
Pages that we want to track for NOTDIRTY are RAM. We do not really need to go through the I/O path to handle them. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson --- include/exec/cpu-common.h | 2 -- accel/tcg/cputlb.c| 26 +--- exec.c| 50