On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 04:11:19PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 07:56:10PM +, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> diff --git a/qapi/qom.json b/qapi/qom.json
> >> index f982850bca..901ba67634 100644
> >> --- a/qapi/qom.j
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 07:56:10PM +, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
[...]
>> diff --git a/qapi/qom.json b/qapi/qom.json
>> index f982850bca..901ba67634 100644
>> --- a/qapi/qom.json
>> +++ b/qapi/qom.json
>> @@ -1068,6 +1068,20 @@
>>'data': { '*cpu-affinity':
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 07:56:10PM +, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> This option selects which measurement algorithm to use for attestation.
> Supported values are SHA256 and SHA512. Default to SHA512 arbitrarily.
I'd suggest that defaulting to sha256 is the better choice.
sha512 is overkill
This option selects which measurement algorithm to use for attestation.
Supported values are SHA256 and SHA512. Default to SHA512 arbitrarily.
SHA512 is generally faster on 64-bit architectures. On a few arm64 CPUs
I tested SHA256 is much faster, but that's most likely because they only
support ac
