On Mon, 4 May 2020 15:25:16 +0200
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 06:25:24PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:59:58 +0200
> > Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >
> > > The _STA method dates back to the days where we had a static DSDT. The
> > > device is listed in t
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 06:25:24PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:59:58 +0200
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > The _STA method dates back to the days where we had a static DSDT. The
> > device is listed in the DSDT table unconditionally and the _STA method
> > checks a bit in t
Hi,
> Also, it may be worth a ISA_PARALLEL_IOBASE 0x378 definition cleanup like
> you did with the RTC.
Next patch in series deals with that.
take care,
Gerd
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 15:59:58 +0200
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> The _STA method dates back to the days where we had a static DSDT. The
> device is listed in the DSDT table unconditionally and the _STA method
> checks a bit in the isa bridge pci config space to figure whenever a
> given is isa device i
On 4/29/20 3:59 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
The _STA method dates back to the days where we had a static DSDT. The
device is listed in the DSDT table unconditionally and the _STA method
checks a bit in the isa bridge pci config space to figure whenever a
given is isa device is present or not, then
The _STA method dates back to the days where we had a static DSDT. The
device is listed in the DSDT table unconditionally and the _STA method
checks a bit in the isa bridge pci config space to figure whenever a
given is isa device is present or not, then evaluates to 0x0f (present)
or 0x00 (absent
