23.05.2020 00:33, Eric Blake wrote:
On 5/22/20 11:19 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Most of coroutine wrappers already follow this notation:
s/of/of our/
s/notation/convention/
We have coroutine_fn bdrv_co_(), which
is the core functions, and wrapper, which does polling loope is ca
On 5/22/20 11:19 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Most of coroutine wrappers already follow this notation:
s/of/of our/
s/notation/convention/
We have coroutine_fn bdrv_co_(), which
is the core functions, and wrapper, which does polling loope is called
bdrv_().
We have 'coroutine_fn
Most of coroutine wrappers already follow this notation:
We have coroutine_fn bdrv_co_(), which
is the core functions, and wrapper, which does polling loope is called
bdrv_().
The only outsiders are bdrv_prwv_co and bdrv_common_block_status_above
wrappers. Let's refactor the to behave as the othe
