John Snow writes:
> On 2/25/21 9:23 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> This is a small rewrite to address some minor style nits.
>>>
>>> Don't compare against the empty list to check for the empty condition, and
>>> move the normalization forward to unify the check on the
On 2/25/21 9:23 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
This is a small rewrite to address some minor style nits.
Don't compare against the empty list to check for the empty condition, and
move the normalization forward to unify the check on the now-normalized
structure.
With the chec
John Snow writes:
> This is a small rewrite to address some minor style nits.
>
> Don't compare against the empty list to check for the empty condition, and
> move the normalization forward to unify the check on the now-normalized
> structure.
>
> With the check unified, the local nested function
This is a small rewrite to address some minor style nits.
Don't compare against the empty list to check for the empty condition, and
move the normalization forward to unify the check on the now-normalized
structure.
With the check unified, the local nested function isn't needed anymore
and can be
