Re: [PATCH v3 05/19] docs/devel: document expectations for HMP commands in the future

2021-10-28 Thread Markus Armbruster
Daniel P. Berrangé writes: > We no longer wish to have commands implemented in HMP only. All commands > should start with a QMP implementation and the HMP merely be a shim > around this. To reduce the burden of implementing QMP commands where > there is low expectation of machine usage, requireme

Re: [PATCH v3 05/19] docs/devel: document expectations for HMP commands in the future

2021-10-04 Thread Eric Blake
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 02:23:35PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > We no longer wish to have commands implemented in HMP only. All commands > should start with a QMP implementation and the HMP merely be a shim > around this. To reduce the burden of implementing QMP commands where > there is low

[PATCH v3 05/19] docs/devel: document expectations for HMP commands in the future

2021-09-30 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
We no longer wish to have commands implemented in HMP only. All commands should start with a QMP implementation and the HMP merely be a shim around this. To reduce the burden of implementing QMP commands where there is low expectation of machine usage, requirements for QAPI modelling are relaxed pr