Cc: Phil, because we're now discusing qemu-system-any.
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 09:25:54AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 12:07:58PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >> To be fair, object_new() was not
On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 09:25:54AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 12:07:58PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> To be fair, object_new() was not designed for use with user-provided
> >> type names. When it chokes on type names not pro
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 12:07:58PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>>
>> > NB, this series is targetting 10.0, NOT for 9.2 freeze.
>> >
>> > With code like
>> >
>> > Object *obj = object_new(TYPE_BLAH)
>> >
>> > the caller can be pr
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 12:07:58PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > NB, this series is targetting 10.0, NOT for 9.2 freeze.
> >
> > With code like
> >
> > Object *obj = object_new(TYPE_BLAH)
> >
> > the caller can be pretty confident that they will successful
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> NB, this series is targetting 10.0, NOT for 9.2 freeze.
>
> With code like
>
> Object *obj = object_new(TYPE_BLAH)
>
> the caller can be pretty confident that they will successfully create
> an object instance of TYPE_BLAH. They know exactly what type has been
> r
NB, this series is targetting 10.0, NOT for 9.2 freeze.
With code like
Object *obj = object_new(TYPE_BLAH)
the caller can be pretty confident that they will successfully create
an object instance of TYPE_BLAH. They know exactly what type has been
requested, so it passing an abstract type for
