Hi Phil,
On 6/16/25 2:59 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Alejandro,
On 12/6/25 22:59, Alejandro Jimenez wrote:
Hi Ethan,
On 6/12/25 4:36 AM, Ethan MILON wrote:
Hi,
Is this series the right place to include the following minor fix?
I would defer this change for two reasons:
1) This
Hi Alejandro,
On 12/6/25 22:59, Alejandro Jimenez wrote:
Hi Ethan,
On 6/12/25 4:36 AM, Ethan MILON wrote:
Hi,
Is this series the right place to include the following minor fix?
I would defer this change for two reasons:
1) This series has been reviewed and tested already. I was hoping it
Hi Ethan,
On 6/12/25 4:36 AM, Ethan MILON wrote:
Hi,
Is this series the right place to include the following minor fix?
I would defer this change for two reasons:
1) This series has been reviewed and tested already. I was hoping it
would be included on the Jun 1st pull but I sent v3 too la
Hi,
Is this series the right place to include the following minor fix?
diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
index 0775c..18d30e1 100644
--- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static void amdvi_writeq(AMDVIState *s, hwaddr addr,
uint64_t val)
{
The main reason for sending this new revision so soon is that v2 included a
duplicated [PATCH 5/7]. I fixed a typo in the commit subject and missed
removing the old patch. Apologies for the mistake.
Additional changes in v3:
- Fixed typo on [PATCH 1/7] subject line (s/Miscellanous/Miscellaneous/).
