On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 09:05:34AM +0200, Albert Esteve wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 7:57 PM Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>
> > This patch series could use tests. The first two patches seem broken and
> > testing would have revealed that the memory allocation and pointers are
> > not quite right.
>
On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 7:57 PM Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> This patch series could use tests. The first two patches seem broken and
> testing would have revealed that the memory allocation and pointers are
> not quite right.
>
My bad. Previous version of the patch I did test with a device that I'v
This patch series could use tests. The first two patches seem broken and
testing would have revealed that the memory allocation and pointers are
not quite right.
One testing approach is to write a test device using libvhost-user that
exposes VIRTIO Shared Memory Regions, launch QEMU in qtest mode
Link to the documentation:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240912144432.126717-1-aest...@redhat.com/T/#t
On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 4:53 PM Albert Esteve wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> v2->v3:
> - Add track for mapped memory in VIRTIO
> Shared memory regions, so that boundaries
> can be verified when a req
Hi all,
v2->v3:
- Add track for mapped memory in VIRTIO
Shared memory regions, so that boundaries
can be verified when a request for
new mmap is received
- Use address_space_read/write() for
MEM_READ/_WRITE handling methods.
- Improve/fix support for flexible
array members for MEM_READ/_