On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 16:13:52 -0600
Richard Henderson wrote:
> While testing the float128_muladd changes for s390x host,
> emulating under x86_64 of course, I noticed that the code
> we generate for strings of ALCGR and SLBGR is pretty awful.
>
> I realized that we were missing a trick: the outpu
On 14.12.20 23:13, Richard Henderson wrote:
> While testing the float128_muladd changes for s390x host,
> emulating under x86_64 of course, I noticed that the code
> we generate for strings of ALCGR and SLBGR is pretty awful.
>
> I realized that we were missing a trick: the output cc is
> based on
While testing the float128_muladd changes for s390x host,
emulating under x86_64 of course, I noticed that the code
we generate for strings of ALCGR and SLBGR is pretty awful.
I realized that we were missing a trick: the output cc is
based only on the output (result and carry) and so we don't
need