Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il lun 9 nov 2020, 22:19 Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
>
>> This function now warns, except for "help" and "?". The exception
>> applies even when we treat "help" and "?" as sugar for "help=on" and
>> "?=on" because opts_accepts_any().
>>
>
> Right, because again help_wa
Il lun 9 nov 2020, 22:19 Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
> This function now warns, except for "help" and "?". The exception
> applies even when we treat "help" and "?" as sugar for "help=on" and
> "?=on" because opts_accepts_any().
>
Right, because again help_wanted will be false for non-validat
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Options such as "server" or "nowait", that are commonly found in -chardev,
> are sugar for "server=on" and "wait=off". This is quite surprising and
> also does not have any notion of typing attached. It is even possible to
> do "-device e1000,noid" and get a device with
Options such as "server" or "nowait", that are commonly found in -chardev,
are sugar for "server=on" and "wait=off". This is quite surprising and
also does not have any notion of typing attached. It is even possible to
do "-device e1000,noid" and get a device with "id=off".
Deprecate it and prin
