Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] gdbstub: Add support for target-specific stubs

Gustavo Romero writes: > Hi Alex, > > On 6/14/24 8:27 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: >> Gustavo Romero writes: >> >>> Currently, it's not possible to have stubs specific to a given target, >>> even though there are GDB features which are target-specific, like, for >>> instance, memory tagging. >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] gdbstub: Add support for target-specific stubs

Hi Alex, On 6/14/24 8:27 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: Gustavo Romero writes: Currently, it's not possible to have stubs specific to a given target, even though there are GDB features which are target-specific, like, for instance, memory tagging. This commit introduces gdb_extend_qsupported_feature

Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] gdbstub: Add support for target-specific stubs

Gustavo Romero writes: > Currently, it's not possible to have stubs specific to a given target, > even though there are GDB features which are target-specific, like, for > instance, memory tagging. > > This commit introduces gdb_extend_qsupported_features, > gdb_extend_query_table, and gdb_extend

[PATCH v2 3/9] gdbstub: Add support for target-specific stubs

Currently, it's not possible to have stubs specific to a given target, even though there are GDB features which are target-specific, like, for instance, memory tagging. This commit introduces gdb_extend_qsupported_features, gdb_extend_query_table, and gdb_extend_set_table functions as interfaces t