Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] ramfb: implement migration support

2023-10-02 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 10/2/23 13:11, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Marc-André Lureau > > Implementing RAMFB migration is quite straightforward. One caveat is to > treat the whole RAMFBCfg as a blob, since that's what is exposed to the > guest directly. This avoid having to fiddle with endianness issues

Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] ramfb: implement migration support

2023-10-02 Thread Laszlo Ersek
On 10/2/23 14:01, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 3:12 PM wrote: >> >> From: Marc-André Lureau >> >> Implementing RAMFB migration is quite straightforward. One caveat is to >> treat the whole RAMFBCfg as a blob, since that's what is exposed to the >> guest directly. This

Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] ramfb: implement migration support

2023-10-02 Thread Marc-André Lureau
Hi On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 3:12 PM wrote: > > From: Marc-André Lureau > > Implementing RAMFB migration is quite straightforward. One caveat is to > treat the whole RAMFBCfg as a blob, since that's what is exposed to the > guest directly. This avoid having to fiddle with endianness issues if we >

[PATCH v2 3/5] ramfb: implement migration support

2023-10-02 Thread marcandre . lureau
From: Marc-André Lureau Implementing RAMFB migration is quite straightforward. One caveat is to treat the whole RAMFBCfg as a blob, since that's what is exposed to the guest directly. This avoid having to fiddle with endianness issues if we were to migrate fields individually as integers. The fo