Le 06/11/2020 à 18:09, Richard Henderson a écrit :
> On 11/6/20 7:27 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> +if (fprs & FPRS_DU) {
>> +for (i = 16; i < 31; i++) {
>
> 32.
>
> Otherwise,
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
>
> r~
>
Applied to my linux-user-for-6.0 branch with this change
On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 17:09, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 11/6/20 7:27 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > +if (fprs & FPRS_DU) {
> > +for (i = 16; i < 31; i++) {
>
> 32.
Derp. Lucky this code basically never gets run, eh ? :-)
-- PMM
On 11/6/20 7:27 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> +if (fprs & FPRS_DU) {
> +for (i = 16; i < 31; i++) {
32.
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson
r~
The handling of the FPU state in sparc64_get_context() and
sparc64_set_context() is not the same as what the kernel actually
does: we unconditionally read and write the FP registers and the
FSR, GSR and FPRS, but the kernel logic is more complicated:
* in get_context the kernel has code for saving
