On Donnerstag, 7. Oktober 2021 17:18:03 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:09:16PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 16:42:34 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 02:50:07PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > > On
On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 03:09:16PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 16:42:34 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 02:50:07PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 13:06:55 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Tu
On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 16:42:34 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 02:50:07PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 13:06:55 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > > On Di
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 02:50:07PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 13:06:55 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 17:10:40 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Tu
On Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 13:06:55 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 17:10:40 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 03:15:26PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > > On Di
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 17:10:40 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 03:15:26PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 14:45:56 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On Mo
On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 17:10:40 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 03:15:26PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 14:45:56 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > > Refac
On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 03:15:26PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 14:45:56 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > > Refactor VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to effectively become a runtime
> > > variable per
On Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2021 14:45:56 CEST Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > Refactor VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to effectively become a runtime
> > variable per virtio user.
>
> virtio user == virtio device model?
Yes
> > Reasons:
> >
>
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Refactor VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to effectively become a runtime
> variable per virtio user.
virtio user == virtio device model?
>
> Reasons:
>
> (1) VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE should reflect the absolute theoretical
> maximum queu
On Mon, 4 Oct 2021 21:38:04 +0200
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> Refactor VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to effectively become a runtime
> variable per virtio user.
>
> Reasons:
>
> (1) VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE should reflect the absolute theoretical
> maximum queue size possible. Which is actually the maxim
Refactor VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE to effectively become a runtime
variable per virtio user.
Reasons:
(1) VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE should reflect the absolute theoretical
maximum queue size possible. Which is actually the maximum
queue size allowed by the virtio protocol. The appropriate
value for
12 matches
Mail list logo