Yes - it's just a cleanup.
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:20:01AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:17:04AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:57:04PM -0500, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> > > The current vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy() impleme
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 03:17:04AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:57:04PM -0500, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> > The current vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy() implementation
> > populates each region of the VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE message without
> > first checking if t
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:57:04PM -0500, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> The current vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy() implementation
> populates each region of the VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE message without
> first checking if there are more than VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS already
> populated. This can c
The current vhost_user_set_mem_table_postcopy() implementation
populates each region of the VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE message without
first checking if there are more than VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS already
populated. This can cause memory corruption if too many regions are
added to the message durin