Any chance this can get reviewed and perhaps merged?
We would like to enable discard-no-unref by default on oVirt, as this
makes qcow2 inside LVM LV's way more reliable (because we can calculate
the size).
But we are still missing this measure patch to be able to properly
calculate the destina
Hi,
First of all sorry for the huge delay, but didn't had time to follow-up
on this lately.
And it got some lower priority, as we don't hit it often and have a
fairly easy workaround (fill the empty blocks again in the snapshot by
writing data to the disk).
On 7/10/24 14:58, Hanna Czenczek w
On 05.06.24 15:25, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote:
When doing a measure on an image with a backing file and
discard-no-unref is enabled, the code should take this into account.
That doesn’t make sense to me. As far as I understand, 'measure' is
supposed to report how much space you need for a given
When doing a measure on an image with a backing file and
discard-no-unref is enabled, the code should take this into account.
If for example you have a snapshot image with a base, and you do a
discard within the snapshot, it will be ZERO and ALLOCATED, but without
host offset.
Now if we commit thi
