On 12/15/20 11:55 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
On 11/16/20 3:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
_make_tree might receive a dict or some other type.
Are you talking about @obj?
Yes.
Recommend to be explict: _make_tree()'s first argument can be ...
John Snow writes:
> On 11/16/20 3:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> _make_tree might receive a dict or some other type.
>>
>> Are you talking about @obj?
>>
>
> Yes.
Recommend to be explict: _make_tree()'s first argument can be ...
> It *usually* takes a dict.
On 11/16/20 3:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
_make_tree might receive a dict or some other type.
Are you talking about @obj?
Yes. It *usually* takes a dict. sometimes it doesn't.
Adding features
information should a
John Snow writes:
> _make_tree might receive a dict or some other type.
Are you talking about @obj?
> Adding features
> information should arguably be performed by the caller at such a time
> when we know the type of the object and don't have
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:42:46PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> _make_tree might receive a dict or some other type. Adding features
> information should arguably be performed by the caller at such a time
> when we know the type of the object and don't have to re-interrogate it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joh
_make_tree might receive a dict or some other type. Adding features
information should arguably be performed by the caller at such a time
when we know the type of the object and don't have to re-interrogate it.
Signed-off-by: John Snow
---
scripts/qapi/introspect.py | 19 ---
1 f
