Re: [PATCH v2 04/15] block: Don't attach inactive child to active node

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 06:12:35PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > An active node makes unrestricted use of its children and would possibly > run into assertion failures when it operates on an inactive child node. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf > --- > block.c | 5 + > 1 file changed, 5 insertions

Re: [PATCH v2 04/15] block: Don't attach inactive child to active node

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 06:12:35PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote: > An active node makes unrestricted use of its children and would possibly > run into assertion failures when it operates on an inactive child node. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf > --- > block.c | 5 + > 1 file changed, 5 insertions

[PATCH v2 04/15] block: Don't attach inactive child to active node

An active node makes unrestricted use of its children and would possibly run into assertion failures when it operates on an inactive child node. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf --- block.c | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/block.c b/block.c index f60606f242..94368a200e 100644 --