On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 11:16 PM Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> Le 31/05/2021 à 07:50, YAMAMOTO Takashi a écrit :
> > It's problematic to return AT_EXECFD as it is because the user app
> > would close it.
> > This patch opens it via /proc/self/fd instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi
> > --
Le 31/05/2021 à 07:50, YAMAMOTO Takashi a écrit :
> It's problematic to return AT_EXECFD as it is because the user app
> would close it.
> This patch opens it via /proc/self/fd instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi
> ---
> linux-user/syscall.c | 12 +++-
> 1 file changed, 11 inser
It's problematic to return AT_EXECFD as it is because the user app
would close it.
This patch opens it via /proc/self/fd instead.
Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 12 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux
