On 2/4/21 10:02 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> It would also help if the patches which were already reviewed were already
> merged in qemu master.
I'll queue the ones that have been reviewed to tcg-next.
That'll get this lot down into the 60's. :-)
r~
On 2/4/21 10:02 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 04.02.21 um 10:58 schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> Not listed, but also a problem:
>> * it's a configure-time choice, not a runtime choice
>
> That's the feature which I also desire most.
Well... that depends on how you see tci being most used.
If, like Joh
On 2/4/21 10:02 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Is there a Git repository which makes pulling all changes easier?
https://gitlab.com/rth7680/qemu/-/tree/tci-next
> Regarding misaligned bytecode access, there exist two solutions. We could
> either use code which handles that correctly (I had sent a patch
Am 04.02.21 um 10:58 schrieb Peter Maydell:
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 01:49, Richard Henderson
wrote:
Almost 7 years ago I detailed 5 major problems in tci[1], of
which three still remain:
* Unaligned accesses to the bytecode stream, which means
that we immediately SIGBUS on any host requi
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 at 01:49, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> Almost 7 years ago I detailed 5 major problems in tci[1], of
> which three still remain:
>
> * Unaligned accesses to the bytecode stream, which means
> that we immediately SIGBUS on any host requiring alignment.
> * Non-portable cal
Patchew URL:
https://patchew.org/QEMU/20210204014509.882821-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org/
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: 20210204014509.882821-1-richard.hender...@linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 00/93
Almost 7 years ago I detailed 5 major problems in tci[1], of
which three still remain:
* Unaligned accesses to the bytecode stream, which means
that we immediately SIGBUS on any host requiring alignment.
* Non-portable calls to helper functions.
* Full of useless ifdefs and TODOs.
To my
