Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] MAX78000FTHR Implementation

2025-07-03 Thread Peter Maydell
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 at 03:50, wrote: > > v2 changes: Addresses comments by Peter. Thanks for sending out a v2, and sorry it's taken me a couple of weeks to get to it for review. I've left comments on the various patches, but this is looking pretty good. I should mention that QEMU's softfreeze fo

[PATCH v2 00/11] MAX78000FTHR Implementation

2025-06-18 Thread jcksn
v2 changes: Addresses comments by Peter. For each device: - Switched soc to use sysbus_realize - Standardized switch case bracing, indentation, and error case - Added valid min and max access size - Changed endianness to DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN - Added reset method, if not already implemented - Added

[PATCH v2 00/11] MAX78000FTHR Implementation

2025-06-18 Thread Jackson Donaldson
> A minor note on email patchseries formatting: something odd > seems to have happened with your cover letter. Patches in a > series are supposed to be followups to the cover letter, but > in this case each patch email has a header > In-reply-to: 20250510042043.2056265-1-jc...@duck.com > but tha