Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] PCI: Implement basic PCI PM capability backing

2025-03-05 Thread Cédric Le Goater
On 2/25/25 22:52, Alex Williamson wrote: v2: Eric noted in v1 that one of the drivers had a redundant wmask setting since pci_pm_init() enabled writes to the power state field. This was added because vfio-pci was not setting wmask for this capability but is allowing writes to the PM state field

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] PCI: Implement basic PCI PM capability backing

2025-03-04 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 01:18:45PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > Hello Michael, > > Could you please re-ack (or not) v2 ? > > Thanks > > C. pci things: Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin > On 2/25/25 22:52, Alex Williamson wrote: > > v2: > > > > Eric noted in v1 that one of the drivers had

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] PCI: Implement basic PCI PM capability backing

2025-03-04 Thread Cédric Le Goater
Hello Michael, Could you please re-ack (or not) v2 ? Thanks C. On 2/25/25 22:52, Alex Williamson wrote: v2: Eric noted in v1 that one of the drivers had a redundant wmask setting since pci_pm_init() enabled writes to the power state field. This was added because vfio-pci was not setting wma

[PATCH v2 0/5] PCI: Implement basic PCI PM capability backing

2025-02-25 Thread Alex Williamson
v2: Eric noted in v1 that one of the drivers had a redundant wmask setting since pci_pm_init() enabled writes to the power state field. This was added because vfio-pci was not setting wmask for this capability but is allowing writes to the PM state field through to the device. For vfio-pci, QEMU