On 25/09/2023 16:17, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 25.09.23 13:40, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote:
On 15/09/2023 13:21, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 05.09.23 15:08, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote:
When the discard-no-unref flag is enabled, we keep the reference for
normal discard requests.
But when a discard is ex
On 25.09.23 13:40, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote:
On 15/09/2023 13:21, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 05.09.23 15:08, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote:
When the discard-no-unref flag is enabled, we keep the reference for
normal discard requests.
But when a discard is executed on a snapshot/qcow2 image with backing,
On 15/09/2023 13:21, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 05.09.23 15:08, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote:
When the discard-no-unref flag is enabled, we keep the reference for
normal discard requests.
But when a discard is executed on a snapshot/qcow2 image with backing,
the discards are saved as zero clusters in t
On 05.09.23 15:08, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote:
When the discard-no-unref flag is enabled, we keep the reference for
normal discard requests.
But when a discard is executed on a snapshot/qcow2 image with backing,
the discards are saved as zero clusters in the snapshot image.
When committing the snap
When the discard-no-unref flag is enabled, we keep the reference for
normal discard requests.
But when a discard is executed on a snapshot/qcow2 image with backing,
the discards are saved as zero clusters in the snapshot image.
When committing the snapshot to the backing file, not
discard_in_l2_sl
