On Nov 4 17:32, Waldek Kozaczuk wrote:
> I have run my tests on the OSv side with small queue sizes like 3,4,5 and I
> could NOT replicate the issue. So it looks like the V2 version of this
> patch fixes the problem.
>
Thanks for testing Waldek!
May I add a Tested-by tag to the commit for you?
I have run my tests on the OSv side with small queue sizes like 3,4,5 and I
could NOT replicate the issue. So it looks like the V2 version of this
patch fixes the problem.
Thanks a lot,
Waldemar Kozaczuk
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 1:57 PM Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 01:15:19PM +010
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 01:15:19PM +0100, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen
>
> If a host chooses to use the SQHD "hint" in the CQE to know if there is
> room in the submission queue for additional commands, it may result in a
> situation where there are not enough internal resources (stru
On Oct 29 13:15, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen
>
> If a host chooses to use the SQHD "hint" in the CQE to know if there is
> room in the submission queue for additional commands, it may result in a
> situation where there are not enough internal resources (struct
> NvmeRequest) availab
From: Klaus Jensen
If a host chooses to use the SQHD "hint" in the CQE to know if there is
room in the submission queue for additional commands, it may result in a
situation where there are not enough internal resources (struct
NvmeRequest) available to process the command. For a lack of a better
