RE: [PATCH v2] docs/devel: Explain in more detail the TB chaining mechanisms

2021-06-01 Thread Luis Fernando Fujita Pires
From: Bruno Piazera Larsen > I feel like there is either a comma missing or the paragraph can be reordered > a bit here. The way it is written means that there are many cases where the > TB is already available and you'll be explaining how the handle the most > common of such cases, but by cha

Re: [PATCH v2] docs/devel: Explain in more detail the TB chaining mechanisms

2021-06-01 Thread Bruno Piazera Larsen
I don't know enough about the technical information to say if the docs are correct, but there were 2 paragraphs where I think wording could be improved to make the explanation more clear. On 31/05/2021 18:14, Luis Pires wrote: Signed-off-by: Luis Pires --- v2: - s/outer execution loop/main

[PATCH v2] docs/devel: Explain in more detail the TB chaining mechanisms

2021-05-31 Thread Luis Pires
Signed-off-by: Luis Pires --- v2: - s/outer execution loop/main loop - Mention re-evaluation of cpu_exec_interrupt() - Changed wording on lookup_and_goto_ptr() - Added more details to step 2 of goto+tb + exit_tb - Added details about when goto_tb + exit_tb cannot be used docs/devel/tcg.rst